UW Parkside Admissions ACT Scores, Acceptance Rate...

Social Confinement in Austen’s Sense and Sensibility

When Charlotte Bronte said of Jane Austen’s novels ‘I should hardly like to live with their ladies and gentlemen, in their elegant but confined houses’ she was referring to the physical confinement of an interior versus an exterior setting. This confinement of the setting mirrors the social confinement of a woman versus a man in the societal structure at the end of the 18th and beginning of the 19th century. While Austen studies the societal position of women in most of her novels, her early work Sense and Sensibility, is perhaps the most interesting to take into consideration when reviewing the issue of confinement. In it Austen juxtaposes the freedom of the countryside exteriors with the confinement of the city’s interiors. These settings serve as a backdrop for the exploration of two female characters whose social status has been set back as a result of the primogeniture of the time. Austen’s novels have always been lauded for their social commentary and critique. The most common issue they depict is the dependency of women in society upon men, specifically their reliance on marriage as a source of income. The characters of Marianne and Elinor in Sense and Sensibility are two such characters, who due to their estate and income being inherited by their stepbrother, are left to their own devices of securing a favorable marriage. The two sisters, so different in character, mirror the contrast of the depictions of interiors and nature in the novel. The free-spiritedShow MoreRelatedMorality Play Pattern in Pride and Prejudice995 Words   |  4 PagesAusten is particularly unusual among virtue ethicists past and present in according amiability so much importance, even though it is so obviously central to most peoples lives working, if not living, in close confinement with others with whom one must and should get along. Austen presents these virtues as not merel y a necessary accommodation to difficult circumstances, but as superior to the invidious vanity and pride of the rich and titled, which she often mocks. So, in  Pride and Prejudice, ElizabethRead MoreA Study on Metafictive Devices in the French Lieutenant’s Woman5819 Words   |  24 Pagesmaterials, the paper holds the perception that through metafictive devices, Fowles has expressed his critical point of view towards Victorian era and woman emancipation. As a multi-faceted new woman in the novel, Sarah liberates herself from rigid social conventions and finally achieves her spiritual emancipation. Key words: metafictive devices; woman emancipation; Victorian era Contents I. Introduction†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦...1 II. The Study of Metafictive Devices of The French Lieutenant’s

Talent vs. Determination Free Essays

Ever since baseball has been a recognized sport there has always been the argument of whether it’s better to have sheer talent or heart and desire. Two of baseball’s best players perfectly illustrate this conflict. Hanley Ramirez is what some baseball enthusiasts would call, a â€Å"five tool player. We will write a custom essay sample on Talent vs. Determination or any similar topic only for you Order Now † Essentially, he was born to play baseball. David Eckstein on the other hand, isn’t exactly the model athlete. The differences and similarities between these two players make them both great baseball players but in very different ways.Upon looking at the two, it is clear that Ramirez was physically groomed to be an athlete. Standing six foot-three inches, weighing 225 pounds, and built like a Greek god, his presence is ominous. While Eckstein, standing a mere five foot-seven inches and weighing 177 pounds, looks more like a choir boy than a major league baseball player. Ramirez is capable of hitting for power and contact, playing defense very well, throwing out anybody in the majors, and he’s lightning fast. It is hard to fathom how they play the same position.Eckstein is lucky to hit the ball out of the infield, has a mediocre arm at best, and is an average runner. He is the epitome of bland. However, what Eckstein lacks in raw ability, he makes up for in his work ethic and love of the game. When he was growing up, every coach he ever had would say, â€Å"you’re good, but you’re just too small†, or â€Å" I can’t put a five foot seven shortstop on my team! †. But that never stopped him. Even as a major league player he is practicing and working every day, trying to get better.Since he plays the game how it should be played, his teammates look to him as a leader. That is what makes him great. Conversely, Ramirez is gifted with such talent, but plays lazy. A number of times his coach has benched him for his poor attitude, or his lack of effort. It’s almost as if he walks around with a chip on his shoulder because of his ability. Ramirez will hit a ball that he thinks the defense will catch and he jogs down to first base as if he doesn’t care.His utter lack of discipline may come back to haunt him. Although both Ramirez and Eckstein are now in the major leagues, they got there by drastically different means. Growing up in the Dominican Republic, Ramirez didn’t have much, but he did have baseball. He always played growing up, but never dreamed about making a living out of it. Baseball is what brought him to the United States and how he makes his living. Eckstein, coming from a slightly more affluent family, enjoyed baseball and played throughout high school. His standard route to the majors took him through college, the minor leagues and finally the majors. Both of these men have made a big name for themselves in major league baseball. Ramirez the hard hitting giant, with a cannon for an arm, and Eckstein with the heart of a lion have earned their recognition for being exceptional at their sport. Coming from polar opposite back rounds, and gaining respect very differently, these two only add fuel to the argument of talent versus determination. How to cite Talent vs. Determination, Papers

Essay about Night by Elie Wiesel Example For Students

Essay about Night by Elie Wiesel Night is a novel written from the perspective of a Jewish teenager, about his experiences as a prisoner during the Holocaust. Our teenager named Eliezer grew up in the small community of Sighet, located in Hungarian Transylvania. It’s here that Eliezer studies religion, both the Cabbala and the Torah. At the beginning of the war Eliezer was dedicated and absolute in his belief of God, but throughout the events of World War II his faith slowly starts to wither away. Eliezers main conflict that governs the story would be sustaining his belief in God. This becomes especially hard throughout the book, as he has to face more and more challenging ssues. Moshe the Beadle is the one character that Eliezer learned about his faith from, Moshes teachings frame the conflict that Eliezer faces during the story. One point that Moshe teaches Eliezer is that religion is based on two concepts; that god is everywhere, even within an individual and that faith is based on questions not answers. A majority of the story focuses on our main characters questions, and how he is constantly questioning how their can be such evil the world when he has been told all his life that God is everywhere and since God is good that means that everything is good. Because of this our protagonists feels as though he has been mislead and lied to about the true nature of human beings and the world around him. Like with all the prisoners having a change in heart and willing to do anything they can to survive the day including hurting and betraying their very own family’s, makes Eliezer question why God is so cruel, or if he exists at all. It’s in these moments that Eliezer has lost all faith he had in humanity and religion, which he had previously learned from Moshe. Because of this our protagonists feels as though he has been mislead and lied to about he true nature of human beings and the world around him. Like with all the prisoners having a change in heart and willing to do anything they can to survive the day including hurting and betraying their very own family’s, makes Eliezer question why God is so cruel, or if he exists at all. It’s in these moments that Eliezer has lost all faith he had in humanity and religion, which he had previously learned from Moshe. One point in the story that Eliezer questions his faith in God is when they are forced to watch the hanging of other prisoners, one time the Gestapo even hangs and kills a small child or being associated with the rebels. It seems that during this point the prisoners start to react for means of survival only, family members were turning on each other. The prisoners turn cold hearted and cruel towards each other because now their only concern is survival. Because of the horrific events in the concentration camp and the ever-present risk of death does Eliezer begin to lose his faith in humanity and his God. Eliezer has a tough time understanding how the world and the Gestapo can be capable of this much fury. Because his teachings tell him that God is good, and since God is everywhere the world therefore must be good. Another strong theme from the book is the importance of family bonds, especially if that’s all you have left in harsh conditions. Eliezer has a hard time watching the other families interact because they no longer share a special bond of love but instead share the idea of selfishness. More than once Eliezer experiences the rupture of the bond a family shares between both the father and son. He describes his bond with his father as a support system; they both ensure the other has enough to survive through the day. Their love and commitment for each other makes up for the lack of faith in God Eliezer feels. So instead Eliezer focuses on his fathers respect to all the other people stuck in the same predicament as him. .udcead6523f719b0fe9f2890a7bd6a600 , .udcead6523f719b0fe9f2890a7bd6a600 .postImageUrl , .udcead6523f719b0fe9f2890a7bd6a600 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .udcead6523f719b0fe9f2890a7bd6a600 , .udcead6523f719b0fe9f2890a7bd6a600:hover , .udcead6523f719b0fe9f2890a7bd6a600:visited , .udcead6523f719b0fe9f2890a7bd6a600:active { border:0!important; } .udcead6523f719b0fe9f2890a7bd6a600 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .udcead6523f719b0fe9f2890a7bd6a600 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .udcead6523f719b0fe9f2890a7bd6a600:active , .udcead6523f719b0fe9f2890a7bd6a600:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .udcead6523f719b0fe9f2890a7bd6a600 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .udcead6523f719b0fe9f2890a7bd6a600 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .udcead6523f719b0fe9f2890a7bd6a600 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .udcead6523f719b0fe9f2890a7bd6a600 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .udcead6523f719b0fe9f2890a7bd6a600:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .udcead6523f719b0fe9f2890a7bd6a600 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .udcead6523f719b0fe9f2890a7bd6a600 .udcead6523f719b0fe9f2890a7bd6a600-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .udcead6523f719b0fe9f2890a7bd6a600:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Our staging of Blood Brothers EssayBecause Eliezer believed that his father would die without his support was his one sole reason for not letting the Gestapo kill him in many instances. The story Night takes you on a heart-wrenching story about the events Eliezer must face in order to survive the concentration camps. While there were many challenges he struggles the most with the concept of maintaining his faith in his benevolent God. Part of the challenge that Eliezer has difficulty understanding is how god can be good which in turn makes the whole world good. He doesn’t understand this because before they were deported to the concentration camps Eliezer never had to experience any harsh times, but all of sudden he is stuck as a prisoner in the war and can’t believe that there are people out there as cruel and terrifying as the Gestapo. Eliezer also has difficulty with some of the viciousness that the other prisoners display towards the others, but yet he understands it at the same time, because he is going through the same hunger, pain and desperation. And lastly the bond that Eliezer shares with his father is important to the story because now he has someone whom he can consistently depend on. Without his father we would have seen the hope and humanity lost within Eliezer. The struggle for survival, under harsh conditions changes Eliezer as he undergoes some major changes, one of them being his total faith for his lord and saviour, which then switches to him being hollow of most human emotions. In the end Eliezer has changed from being an innocent schoolboy to a tough and scarred young man, who only has one thought running through his head; survival.